The Micra and Nanostim leadless pacemakers Leadless ... | 合法醫療器材資訊網

Read More

由 T Dar 著作 · 2020 · 被引用 3 次 — Success rate in Nanostim group was around 90% (66/73) compared with 100% in Micra group (p = 0.049). Late retrieval occurred in 50% of Micra TPS ... Read More

... of the primary differences between the 2 LP (Table 1) is the fixation mechanism. While the Micra de- vice has a tine-based fixation mechanism, the Nanostim ... Read More

2020年1月7日 — We sought to report acomparison of retrieval process for Nanostim vs Micra transcatheter LPs. Methods: The list of retrievals for the Micra ... Read More

Panel F: photograph of the Nanostim LCP and Micra TPS. from publication: ... vs 3%,p=0.006) and 541-900 days (97.4% vs 2.2%,p<0.001) after implantation. Read More

2015年11月9日 — Medtronic's leadless pacemaker, the Micra Transcatheter Pacing System (TPS), ... compared to conventional devices, said Brian Urke, ... Read More

由 T Dar 著作 · 2020 · 被引用 3 次 — Overall, both devices have their own advantages and disadvantages. Micra TPS is a short device whereas Nanostim LP is a slightly longer and ... Read More

由 T Dar 著作 · 2019 — Tawseef Dar,; Bharath Yarlagadda,; Muhammad Afzal,; Sharan Sharma,; Paul Friedman,; Vivek Reddy,; Rakesh Gopinathannair,; Sandeep Gautam, ... Read More

2019年3月12日 — We compared the Nanostim (NS) vs Micra transcatheter (MT) LP. Methods: Pertinent details of retrieval such as indication, ... Read More