Safety of mechanical chest compression devices AutoPulse ... | 合法醫療器材資訊網

Read More

由 M Frey 著作 · 2016 · 被引用 2 次 — This could be a possible explanation for the higher incidence ROSC in the load-​distributor group (odds 1.6 versus mechanical CPR) compared to ... Read More

由 RW Koster 著作 · 2017 · 被引用 86 次 — LUCAS does not cause significantly more serious or life-threatening visceral damage than manual CC. For AutoPulse, significantly more serious or life-​threatening ... Read More

2019年11月15日 — Thus, we compared AUTOPULSE directly with LUCAS using. nationwide ... Unwitnessed OHCA patients: AUTOPULSE vs LUCAS. Unmatched ... Read More

of Load-Distributing Band Versus Piston-Driven Systems ... distributing band system (AutoPulse®) were tested on a mannequin. ... system (Lucas 2). Read More

由 A Truhlar 著作 · 2010 · 被引用 15 次 — Conclusion: Use of mechanical chest compression devices was associated with increased incidence of injuries compared to manual CPR but surprisingly also ... Read More

由 SU Khan 著作 · 被引用 21 次 — There were no differences between LUCAS and AutoPulse with regards to survival to hospital admission, neurological recovery or return of spontaneous ... Read More